○Xin
Chunlei,ChenQigong
(SchoolofForeignLanguageEducation,LiaochengUniversity,Liaocheng,Shandong,China252059)[Abstract]Bybrieflyexploringthedifferencesbetweencurriculumandsyllabusandintroducingsixtypesofthe
mostinfluentialsyllabusesinthepastfewdecades,thisarticlegivessomereflectionsonthedesignandimplementationofCollegeEnglishSyllabusforLiaochengUniversity.InitiativesofthenewsyllabusandperiodicalachievementsofCollegeEnglishteachingreformarealsointroduced.ItisconcludedthatCollegeEnglishsyllabusshouldberevisedandperfectedunderCollegeEnglishteachingpractice.
[Keywords]CollegeEnglish;CollegeEnglishteaching;syllabus;syllabusdesign
[中图分类号]H319.2[文献标识码]A[文章编号]1672-8610(2009)01-0131-05
I.Introduction
1.CollegeEnglishteachingandCollegeEnglishsyllabus
Morethantwodecadesago,CollegeEnglishteachingandCollegeEnglishsyllabuswerecalled,respectively,PublicEnglishteachingandPublicEng-lishsyllabus.IntheMarchof1985,CollegeEnglishSyllabus(OntheTeachingofNon-EnglishMajorScienceStudents)wasissuedofficially,anditwasinthissyllabusthattheterm--CollegeEnglishteach-ing,asanimportantdiscipline,wasfirstintroduced.Eversincethen,CollegeEnglishteachingbegantoenjoyboominChina.
InthedevelopmentoftheCollegeEnglishsyl-labusinChina,thefollowingthreesyllabi—CollegeEnglishSyllabus(OntheTeachingofNon-EnglishMajorScienceStudents)1985,CollegeEnglishSyl-labus(OntheTeachingofNon-EnglishMajorSci-enceandNon-ScienceStudents)1986,andCollegeEnglishSyllabus(OntheTeachingofNon-EnglishMajorStudents)1999,playkeyroles.TheyhavegreatlyaffectedtheEnglishlanguageteachingandlearninginChina.
2.CollegeEnglishCurriculumRequirements
AccordingtotheCollegeEnglishCurriculumRe-quirements(forTrialImplementation)2004,“collegesanduniversitiesshouldformulate,inaccordancewith
therequirementsandinthelightoftheirspecificcir-cumstance,ascientific,systemicandindividualizedCollegeEnglishsyllabustoguidetheirownCollegeEnglishteaching”.Thistime,theterm“CollegeEng-lishcurriculum”isusedinsteadofCollegeEnglishsyllabus.Thefollowingwillgivesomebriefreflec-tionsonthedesign,andimplementationofoursyllabus.
II.LiteratureReview:EFLSyllabusDesignThispartwillinvestigatesyllabusdesignfromtheperspectiveofidentifyinganappropriatevehicleforlanguagelearninginastudent-centred,self-di-rected,holistic,cooperativelearningsituation.
1.“Curriculum”and“syllabus”
Beforereviewinglanguage-syllabusdesign,how-ever,itisnecessarytoaddressaconfusioninthelit-eraturebetweentheterms“curriculum”and“syl-
,sincethesecanattimesbeverycloseinlabus”
meaning,dependingonthecontextinwhichtheyareused(Nunan1988:3).
Theconceptof“curriculum”hasbeenimportantinsecond-languageprogrammesthroughoutthehisto-ryofEFL/ESL,and“curriculumtheory”asafieldofeducationalstudiesisfairlynew(Stern1983:434).AccordingtoStern,thefieldofcurriculumstudiesispartofthedisciplineofeducationalstudies.Initsbroadestsense,itreferstothestudyofgoals,content,
[基金项目]“教育部大学英语教学改革示范点项目”(教高司函[2006]78号)。[作者简介]辛春雷,男,聊城大学大学外语教育学院教授,硕士研究生导师,研究方向:应用语言学、英语语言教学
陈其功,男,聊城大学大学外语教育学院教授,硕士研究生导师,研究方向:语体学、英语语言教学。
131
TEACHINGRESEARCHXinChunlei,ChenQigong/ReflectionsontheDesignofCollegeEnglishSyllabus
implementationandevaluationofaneducationalsys-
tem.Initsrestrictedsense,curriculumreferstoacourseofstudyorthecontentofaparticularcourseorprogramme.Itisinthisnarrowersenseofcurricu-lumthattheterm\"syllabus\"isemployed.So“syl-labusdesign”isjustonephaseinasystemofinter-relatedcurriculumdevelopmentactivities.
“Curriculum”asdefinedbyAllenisaverygen-eralconcept.Itinvolvesconsiderationofphilosophi-cal,socialandadministrativefactorswhichcontributetotheplanningofaneducationalprogramme.Inhiswords,thesyllabusis“thatsubpartofcurriculumwhichisconcernedwithaspecificationofwhatunitswillbetaught”(Allen,1984:61).Asyllabuscanalsobeseenasa“summaryofthecontenttowhich
(Yalden.1987:87).learnerswillbeexposed”
Auniversaldefinitionfor“syllabus”seemsim-practical,sincedifferenteducationaltheoriesandap-proachesdifferonsyllabusgoalsandfunctions.Whatcanbesaidisthatanysyllabus,whichispartofanoveralllanguagecurriculum,identifieswhatwillbeworkeduponbytheteacherandstudentsintermsofcontentselectedtobeappropriatetooverallaims(Breen,2001:151).
Fromtheabove,wecancometotheconclusionthat“curriculum”isaglobalplanforteachingalanguagewhileasyllabusisthecontentcomponentsofthe“curriculum”.
2.Typesofsyllabuses
Nunan(1988)dividessyllabusesintotwocate-gories:“product-oriented”syllabusesand“process-oriented”syllabuses.Theformerstresseswhatalearnerwillhaveaccomplishedoncompletionoftheprogramwhilethelatteremphasizesthespecificationoflearningtasksandactivitiesthatalearnerwillun-dertakeduringthecourse.Sixtypesofsyllabuseswillbeintroducedinthefollowingsection.
(1)Product-orientedSyllabuses
Structural(alsoformalorgrammatical)SyllabusThisisknownasthetraditionalsyllabuswhichisorganizedalonggrammaticallinesgivingprimacytolanguageform.Itisthemostrobustandwell-triedtypeofsyllabusinlanguageteaching,growingfromthedescriptionandanalysisoftheclassicallan-guages,andisstillbyfarthemostwidelyused,espe-ciallyinforeignlanguagesettings.Thecontentoflan-guageteachingisacollectionoftheformsandstruc-tures,usuallygrammatical,ofthelanguagebeingtaught.Examplesincludenouns,verbs,adjectives,questions,subordinateclauses,andsoon.
Functional(alsonotionalorfunctional/notional)Syllabus
Thistypeofsyllabusarrangesthelearningmate-rialaccordingtoselectedfunctionsregardlessofthe132
grammarconstructionsthatmaybenecessarytofulfillthosefunctions.Itplacesemphasison“themeaningsexpressedorthefunctionsperformedthroughlan-guage”(Wilkinsetal.1981:83).Syllabuscontentisacollectionofthefunctionsthatareperformedwhenlanguageisused,orofthenotionsthatlanguageisusedtoexpress.Examplesoffunctionsinclude:greeting,agreeing,apologizing;examplesofnotionsincludesize,age,color,time,andsoon.
SituationalSyllabus
Thecontentoflanguageteachingisacollectionofrealorimaginarysituationsinwhichlanguageoc-cursorisused.Asituationusuallyinvolvesseveralparticipantsengagedinsomeactivityinaspecificsetting.Thelanguageoccurringinthesituationin-volvesanumberoffunctions.Theprimarypurposeofasituationallanguageteachingsyllabusistoteachthelanguagethatoccursinthesituations.Examplesofsituationsinclude:seeingthedentistinaclinic,postingaletterinapostoffice,meetinganewstu-dentonthecampus,andsoon.
(2)Process-orientedSyllabusesContent-basedSyllabus
Thecontentoflanguagelearningmightbese-lectedintermsofthelearners’otheracademicorschoolsubject.Thestudentsaresimultaneouslylan-guagestudentsandstudentsofwhatevercontentisbeingtaught.Thesubjectmatterisprimary,andlan-guagelearningoccursincidentallytothecontentlearning.Content-basedlanguageteachingiscon-cernedwithinformation.Anexampleofcontent-basedlanguageteachingisascienceclasstaughtinthelanguagethestudentsneedorwanttolearn,pos-siblywithlinguisticadjustmenttomakethesciencemorecomprehensible.
Task-basedSyllabus
Thetask-basedsyllabusreflectsanemphasison“means”ratherthan“product”,andtheconceptof“languagetask”hasbecomeanimportantbuildingblockwithinthecurriculum(Nunan1993:66).Thecontentoftheteachingisalistoftasksandactivitiesthatastudentwillundertakeinclass.Tasksmustberelevanttotherealworldlanguageneedsofthestu-dentandintegratelanguage(andother)skillsinspe-cificsettingsoflanguageuse.Examplesinclude:ap-plyingforajob,talkingwithapoliceman,gettinghousinginformationoverthetelephone,andsoon.
ProcessSyllabus
TheprocesssyllabusisdefinedbroadlybyBreenas“acontextwithinwhichanysyllabusofsubject-matterismadeworkable”(Breen1987).Thissyllabustypeprovidesaframeworkfordecisionsandalterna-tiveprocedures,activitiesandtasksfortheclassroomgroup.Itopenlyaddressesteachingandlearningand
语文学刊·外语教育教学2009年第1期particularlythepossibleinterrelationshipsbetweensubjectmatter,learningandthepotentialcontribu-tionsofaclassroom.Theactualsyllabusisdesignedastheteachingandlearningproceed.III.DesigningSyllabus
1.Criteriaforsyllabusdesign
syllabusdesignisAccordingtoWebb(1976),
understoodastheorganizationoftheselectedcon-tentsintoanorderedandpracticalsequenceforteachingpurposes.Hiscriteriaforsyllabusdesignareasfollows:
◇progressfromknowntounknownmatter◇appropriatesizeofteachingunits◇apropervarietyofactivity◇teachability
◇creatingasenseofpurposeforthestudentBreenpointsoutthatanysyllabusideallyshouldprovide:
◇aclearframeworkofknowledgeandcapabili-tiesselectedtobeappropriatetooverallaims;
◇continuityandsenseofdirectioninclassroomworkforteacherandstudents;
◇arecordforotherteachersofwhathasbeencoveredinthecourse;
◇abasisforevaluatingstudents’progress;◇abasisforevaluatingtheappropriatenessofthecourseinrelationtooverallaimsandstudentsidentifiedbothbeforeandduringthecourse;
◇contentappropriatetothebroaderlanguagecurriculum,theparticularclassoflearners,andtheeducationalsituationandwidersocietyinwhichthe
(AdoptedfromBreen,2001:151)courseislocated.
2.EnglishteachingcontextinLiaochengUni-versity
NewstudentsofLiaochengUniversityaremostlyaged18-20,andthemajorityofthemcomefromthecountrysideofShandongProvince.Theyusuallyhavealearninghistoryofintensiveknowledge-basedstudyinjuniormiddleschool(3years)andseniormiddleschool(3years),inpreparationfortheNationalEn-tranceExamination.Thelearningsituationinmiddleschoolsisnamelyteacher-controlledandexam-oriented.Inthisformal,product-orientedenvironment,stu-dentslearnthatmemorisationisthemosteffectivelearningstrategy.Whenattendingtheuniversitylis-teningandspeakingEnglishclass,mostofthestu-dentshavelowmotivation,andlackabilityorexperi-enceintheuseofalternativelearningstrategies,re-alisticgoal-setting,orinorganisingtheirstudytime.
InChina,ChineseisthedominatelanguageandEnglishcanonlyberegardedasaforeignlanguage.Sothereislackofexposuretothetargetlanguageoutsidetheclassroom.ThesituationiscompoundedbythefactthatLiaochengUniversityisnotapresti-giousuniversity,norevenamajor-cityuniversity.Itwaschangedintoacomprehensiveuniversityfromanormalcollegeonlyseveralyearsago(in2002).Col-legeEnglishisarequired,compulsorybasiccourseforallundergraduatestudents.Actuallystudentstypi-callyshowadeepsincerityofspirit,awishtodowellbyworkinghard,andresponsivenesstoinnova-tion.
3.Choosingandintegratingsyllabuses
Althoughtheabovesixtypesofsyllabusesaredefinedinisolatedcontexts,itisclearthatnosingletypeisappropriateforallteachingsettings,anditisrareforonetypeofsyllabustobeusedexclusivelyinactualteachingsettings.Syllabustypesareusuallycombinedinmoreorlessintegratedways,withonetypeastheorganizingbasisaroundwhichtheothersarearrangedandrelated.Eclecticismisacommonfeatureofsyllabusdesignnowadays:Acompletesyl-labusspecificationwillincludeallfiveaspects:struc-ture,function,situation,topic,skills.Thedifferencebetweensyllabuseswilllieintheprioritygiventoeachoftheseaspects(White,1988:92).
Intermsofthecontextdescribedaboveandac-cordingtoCollegeEnglishCurriculumRequirements,introductionofaninteractivestudent-centredap-proachandafocusonlanguageabilitiesandskillswillbewelcomed.Atask-basedstrategywithablendofapproachesandemphasisoncommunicativelearn-ingmaywellbeoneofthemostsuitabletypesofsyllabusdesignforLiaochengUniversity.
Thesyllabusshouldencouragethepositiveandtrustingrelationshipsintheclassroom,whicharein-dispensableforthepromotionofstudent/teachercon-fidence,motivation,andindependence,andhenceforlanguagelearningandteaching.Thenewsyllabusismainlyaprocesssyllabus,withsomeelementsofproductsyllabuses.Itincludestasks,functions,situa-tions,topics,skills,cultureandsoon.
4.MainfeaturesofCollegeEnglishSyllabusforLiaochengUniversity.
(1)Outlineofthenewsyllabus
Thesyllabusfallsintothreeparts.Partoneisthespecificationsforformulatingsyllabus.Parttwoisthebodyofthesyllabus,includingteachingobjects,teachingconcepts,teachingobjectives,teachingre-quirements,teachingarrangements,evaluationandteachingadministration.Partthreeisthesixap-pendixes:Computer-andClassroom-basedCollegeEnglishTeachingModel,Self-assessment/PeerAs-sessmentFormforStudents’EnglishCompetence,ReferenceWordListandReferencePhraseListofCollegeEnglishSyllabus,ListofNotional-FunctionalItems,ListofTopicsandListofLanguageSkills.
133
TEACHINGRESEARCHXinChunlei,ChenQigong/ReflectionsontheDesignofCollegeEnglishSyllabus
(2)Mainfeaturesofthenewsyllabus
Themainfeaturesofthenewsyllabuscanbefoundbycomparingandcontrastingitwiththe1999CollegeEnglishSyllabus(seeTable1).
Table1.Comparisonsandcontrastsbetweenthe1999CollegeEnglishSyllabusandthenewsyllabusforLiaochengUniversity
1999syllabus
SyllabusTypeproduct-orientedTeachingObjective
newsyllabusprocess-oriented&product-oriented
abilitytouselanguage
comprehensivelanguageinanall-roundway,ability,readingabilityfirstespeciallyinlistening
andspeaking
relativelystrongreading,writingandtranslatingabilities
certainlistening,speaking,
higherlistening&
Teachingwritingandtranslating
speakingabilities
Requirementsabilities;relativelystrong
readingability
languagelearningstrategiesintercultural
communicationabilityTeachingModel
student-centeredwebor
teacher-centered
computer-based
classroom-basedteaching
teaching&
autonomouslearningknowledge-basedsummative
performance-basedformative&summative
plesanditsteachingandlearningmethods.Theybe-lievethatthenewsyllabusfollowsmodernlinguisticstheories,adoptsthehumanisticapproachandcom-puter-basedteachingmodel,andconsidersaffectiveandcognitivefactors,thusarousingthestudents’in-terestsinlearningandcultivatingtheirautonomous,initiative,problem-solvingandinterculturalcommu-nicativeabilities.Itwilllayasolidfoundationforthestudents’continuinglearningandfuturedevelopment.
2.Improvementofstudents’listeningandspeakingabilities
Throughcomparativeanalysisofthestudents’examinationresultsbetweenthecontrolclasses(162studentsfrom4classes)andtheexperimentalclasses(88studentsfrom2classes),ithasbeenshownthatstudentsinthecontrolclasseshavegainedhigherscoresinlisteningandspeaking,whichachievetheteachingobjectivetodevelopstudents’abilitytouseEnglishinanall-roundway,particularlyinlisteningandspeaking.Thedetailedanalysisisasfollows(thetotalscoreofeachterm:100;listeningandspeakingscoresreportedinpercentageterms):
Table2.Contrastofaverageexamresultsofstu-dents(June,2005)
ClassType
Examcollegefinaltermfinaltermfinalterm
listeningspeakingentrancegeneral
72.6072.52
70.7170.75
60.6154.52
70.7365.52
ExperimentalClassesControlClasses
Evaluation
IV.ImplementationofCollegeEnglishSyllabusin
LiaochengUniversity
Since2004,thenewsyllabusbegantobecar-riedoutontrialpartiallyinLiaochengUniversity.About3000first-year(Grade2004)andsecond-year(Grade2003)studentsfrom4schools(SchoolofChemistry,SchoolofPhysics,SchoolofPoliticsandLaw,andSchoolofHistory)werechosentolearncollegeEnglishbyfollowingthenewsyllabus.Thecoursebook--NewHorizonCollegeEnglishanditsrelevantsoftwarespublishedbyFLTRPwereadopted.FromtheAugustof2005,thenewsyllabushasbeencarriedoutwhollyintheuniversity.
1.Supportfrommostmajorityofteachersandstudents
WiththeprogressofCollegeEnglishteachingreform,aseriesofinvestigationsandevaluationshavebeenmade,whichindicatethatthenewsyllabushasproducedmarkedeffect.
Accordingtoasurvey,inLiaochengUniversity,100%collegeEnglishteachershaveagreedonthenewsyllabusandparticipatedactivelyinteachingre-form;98.14%studentshaveapprovedofitsprinci-134
3.Lightenedworkloadofteaching
About1300studentsinexperimentalclassesneeded125classhoursforteaching.Iftheyweretaughtbythetraditionalteachingmodel,therewouldbeatleast162classhours.Infact37(22.84%ofthetotal)classhoursweresaved.Thestudents’aver-ageacademicrecordwasalittlebitlower,whiletheirmarksinlisteningandspeakingwerehigherthanthoseofthestudentsfromcontrolclasses(seeTable2).
4.Approvalofauthoritiesanduniversities
ThenewsyllabuswasexchangedinworkshopsheldbyChinaEnglishLanguageEducationAssocia-tionandFLTRPbothinXi’anandBeijing.ItwashighlypraisedbysomeoftheEFLexpertsinChina.
In2004,LiaochengUniversitywaschosen,bytheMinistryofEducationinChina,asoneoftheu-niversitieswhichreformedtheCollegeEnglishteach-ingontrial,andin2006,itwasfurtherselectedasoneofthe31universitiescarryingoutmodelprojectoncollegeEnglishteachingreform.
IntheannualmeetingsofShandongProvincialCollegeEnglishTeachingResearchAssociation,LiaochengUniversityhasseveraltimesshareditsex-
语文学刊·外语教育教学2009年第1期UniversityPress,2001:151-159.
[4]CollegeEnglishSyllabusRevisionTeam.CollegeEnglish
Syllabus[Z].Beijing:TheHigherEducationPress,1999.[5]HigherEducationDepartmentoftheMinistryofEducation,
P.R.C.CollegeEnglishCurriculumRequirements(ForTri-alImplementation)[Z].Beijing:TsinghuaUniversityPress,2004.
[6]Nunan,D.TheLearner-centredCurriculum[M].Cam-
bridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1988:3.
[7]Nunan,D.“Task-basedsyllabusdesign:selecting,grading
andsequencingtasks”[A].InCrookes,G.&Gass,S.M.(Eds.).TasksinaPedagogicalContext[C].Cleveland,UK:MultilingualMatters,1993:55-66.
[8]Stern,H.H.FundamentalConceptsofLanguageTeaching
[M].Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,1983:434.
“ReflectionsofPracticalExperienceinDesigning[9]Webb,J.
andMountingESPCoursesattheColchesterEnglish[A].InWilson,G.H.(Ed).CurriculumDe-StudyCentre”
velopmentandSyllabusDesignforEnglishTeaching[C].Singapore:SEAMEORegionalLanguageCentre,1976:121-132.
[10]White,R.V.TheELTCurriculum:Design,Innovationand
Management[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1988:92.
“NotionalSyl-[11]Wilkins,D.,Brumfit,C.J.&Paulston,C.
labusesRevisited:Aresponse,somecomments,andafur-therreply”[J].AppliedLinguistics,1981(2/1):83-90.[12]Yalden,J.PrinciplesofCourseDesignforLanguage
Teaching[M].Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1987:18.
periencewithotheruniversities.Anduptonowthere
havebeenmorethan100collegesanduniversitiescomingtotheuniversitytoexchangeexperience.ThereformwasspeciallyreportedinNovember,2005byShandongEducationTV.V.Conclusion
ItisthefirsttimeinChinaforacollegeoruni-versitytodrawupitsownsyllabusforEnglish.Inmakingpracticaldecisionsaboutsyllabusdesign,wehavetakenintoconsiderationallthepossiblefactorsthatmightaffecttheteachabilityofoursyllabus.Bystartingwithanexaminationofeachsyllabustype,makingtherightchoiceandintegrationofthediffer-enttypesaccordingtotheteachingcontextismostcrucial.Thoughwehavegainedperiodicalachieve-ments,yetthereisalongwaytogo.Astimegoeson,thesyllabushastoberevisedandimplementedinlightofthenewlanguageteachingandlearningtheo-riesputforward,withstudents’Englishlevelim-provedandtheteachingsituationchanged.
——————————————【References】
“Generalpurposelanguageteaching:Avari-[1]Allen,J.P.B.
ablefocusapproach”[A].InBrumfit,C.J.(Ed).GeneralEnglishSyllabusDesign.ELTDocuments[C]No.118.London:PergamonPress&TheBritishCouncil,1984:61-74.
“Contemporaryparadigmsinsyllabusdesign,[2]Breen,M.P.
PartI”.LanguageTeaching[J],1987(20/2):81-91.“SyllabusDesign”[A].InCarter,R.&Nunan,[3]Breen,M.P.
D.(Eds).TheCambridgeGuidetoTeachingEnglishtoSpeakersofOtherLanguages[C].Cambridge:Cambridge
编写大学英语教学大纲的思考
辛春雷,陈其功
(聊城大学大学外语教育学院,山东聊城252059)
[摘要]本文探讨了课程设置与教学大纲的区别,介绍了结构大纲、情景大纲、功能-意念大纲、内容型
大纲、任务型大纲和过程大纲等六种不同类型的大纲,简要回顾了大学英语教学大纲的编写及实施情况;通过新旧大纲的对比,说明了新大纲的创新性,并介绍了教学改革取得的阶段性成果。文章结论是,大学英语教学大纲应在教学改革的实践中不断修改和完善。
[关键词]大学英语;大学英语教学;教学大纲;大纲设计
【英文校对】ZhaoXiaojun135
因篇幅问题不能全部显示,请点此查看更多更全内容
Copyright © 2019- 517ttc.cn 版权所有 赣ICP备2024042791号-8
违法及侵权请联系:TEL:199 18 7713 E-MAIL:2724546146@qq.com
本站由北京市万商天勤律师事务所王兴未律师提供法律服务